Skene
Comparison · Bottom-funnel

Skene vs Totango

This page is for teams comparing Skene to Totango for customer success and lifecycle management tools.

Who this comparison is for

You are evaluating customer success tools and trying to decide between an enterprise playbook platform (Totango) and an AI-powered PLG engine (Skene).

Core category difference

Totango is an enterprise customer success platform with playbook templates, health scoring, and campaign orchestration for CS teams. Skene is an AI engine that automates customer success without playbooks or CS resources.

When Totango is the wrong choice

Totango may not fit if you lack CS resources to build and maintain playbooks, if template-based workflows are too rigid, or if enterprise pricing does not match your stage.

When Skene is the wrong choice

Skene may not fit if you have an established CS org with playbook expertise and need enterprise-grade account management and reporting features.

Architectural comparison

DimensionSkeneTotango
Automation modelAI agents operate autonomously. No playbooks to build.Template-based playbooks executed by CSMs.
Setup5 minutes with repository connection.Weeks of configuration and playbook setup.
Product understandingAnalyzes codebase to understand features automatically.Requires manual integration and attribute mapping.
MaintenanceUpdates automatically with code changes.Playbooks need manual updates when product evolves.
PricingUsage-based, pay per completed onboarding.Per-user licensing with annual commitments.
Best forProduct-led teams without CS overhead.Mid-market/enterprise with CS organizations.

Migration considerations

If maintaining Totango playbooks has become overhead, Skene can replace that manual work with AI-driven automation.

For a deeper comparison, see our Totango alternative page.

Next steps: explore the product overview or start a free trial.

Ready to try Skene?

Skip the comparison spreadsheets. Connect your repo, see your first insights in 5 minutes, and decide from there.