What's Missing in Standard Turso Architecture
Turso manages data correctly, but lacks the infrastructure to track user activity and automatically segment users by engagement levels.
Standard Turso Flow vs Optimized Skene Flow
Standard Flow
1
User has access to Turso features
2
Features available but usage not monitored
3
No activation prompts for unused features
Skene Flow
1
Monitor Turso usage patterns and feature adoption
2
Identify users who haven't used key features
3
Trigger feature discovery emails with examples and use cases
4
Track feature adoption and send advanced usage guides
Visual comparison of the flows:
Loading diagram...
How Skene Fixes This
We created a Skene Prompt that installs behavioral tracking for Turso. It monitors Turso tables for user activity patterns and automatically triggers re-engagement campaigns when users become inactive.
Implementation Comparison
Using Skene Infrastructure
Auto-managed state. Installed via Prompt.
Install via Prompt
cursor.mdc
@task: Initialize Skene.
@action: Analyze my local code, validating subscription via `npx skene login`, and generate `skene.config.ts` to implement the Retention Loop pattern for Turso.Copy Skene Prompt for Cursor
Generated skene.config.ts
skene.config.ts
// skene.config.ts - The Automated Way
import { defineLoop } from '@skene/sdk';
export default defineLoop({
type: 'retention',
opinion: 'Detect dormant users and trigger personalized re-engagement campaigns',
steps: [
{
trigger: {
type: 'schedule',
cron: '0 9 * * *' // Daily at 9 AM
},
condition: {
type: 'query',
query: `SELECT * FROM users WHERE last_activity_at < NOW() - INTERVAL '7 days' AND re_engagement_sent = false`,
timeout: '10m'
},
action: {
type: 'email',
provider: 'resend',
template: 're_engagement',
personalization: {
name: '{{user.name}}',
lastActivity: '{{user.last_activity_at}}'
}
}
}
],
recovery: {
retries: 3,
backoff: 'exponential'
}
});