What's Missing in Standard Postmark Architecture
While Postmark delivers emails reliably, open rates and clicks aren't monitored to identify engaged vs. inactive users for personalized messaging.
Standard Postmark Flow vs Optimized Skene Flow
Standard Flow
1
User has access to Postmark features
2
Features available but usage not monitored
3
No activation prompts for unused features
Skene Flow
1
Monitor Postmark usage patterns and feature adoption
2
Identify users who haven't used key features
3
Trigger feature discovery emails with examples and use cases
4
Track feature adoption and send advanced usage guides
Visual comparison of the flows:
Loading diagram...
How Skene Fixes This
The Skene infrastructure for Postmark monitors email performance and automatically personalizes messaging based on engagement patterns, sending targeted campaigns to re-engage inactive users.
Implementation Comparison
Using Skene Infrastructure
Auto-managed state. Installed via Prompt.
Install via Prompt
cursor.mdc
@task: Initialize Skene.
@action: Analyze my local code, validating subscription via `npx skene login`, and generate `skene.config.ts` to implement the Email Engagement pattern for Postmark.Copy Skene Prompt for Cursor
Generated skene.config.ts
skene.config.ts
// skene.config.ts - The Automated Way
import { defineLoop } from '@skene/sdk';
export default defineLoop({
type: 'retention',
opinion: 'Detect dormant users and trigger personalized re-engagement campaigns',
steps: [
{
trigger: {
type: 'schedule',
cron: '0 9 * * *' // Daily at 9 AM
},
condition: {
type: 'query',
query: `SELECT * FROM users WHERE last_activity_at < NOW() - INTERVAL '7 days' AND re_engagement_sent = false`,
timeout: '10m'
},
action: {
type: 'email',
provider: 'resend',
template: 're_engagement',
personalization: {
name: '{{user.name}}',
lastActivity: '{{user.last_activity_at}}'
}
}
}
],
recovery: {
retries: 3,
backoff: 'exponential'
}
});