What's Missing in Standard Panda CSS Architecture
Panda CSS components are available, but developers stick to basics because there's no automated system to help them discover advanced components and best practices.
Standard Panda CSS Flow vs Optimized Skene Flow
User has access to Panda CSS features
Features available but usage not monitored
No activation prompts for unused features
Monitor Panda CSS usage patterns and feature adoption
Identify users who haven't used key features
Trigger feature discovery emails with examples and use cases
Track feature adoption and send advanced usage guides
Visual comparison of the flows:
Loading diagram...
How Skene Fixes This
We created a Skene Prompt that installs component activation for Panda CSS. It tracks component imports and usage, automatically sending discovery emails with examples for unused components.
Implementation Comparison
Using Skene Infrastructure
Install via Prompt
@task: Initialize Skene.
@action: Analyze my local code, validating subscription via `npx skene login`, and generate `skene.config.ts` to implement the Component Activation pattern for Panda CSS.Copy Skene Prompt for Cursor
Generated skene.config.ts
// skene.config.ts - The Automated Way
import { defineLoop } from '@skene/sdk';
export default defineLoop({
type: 'retention',
opinion: 'Detect dormant users and trigger personalized re-engagement campaigns',
steps: [
{
trigger: {
type: 'schedule',
cron: '0 9 * * *' // Daily at 9 AM
},
condition: {
type: 'query',
query: `SELECT * FROM users WHERE last_activity_at < NOW() - INTERVAL '7 days' AND re_engagement_sent = false`,
timeout: '10m'
},
action: {
type: 'email',
provider: 'resend',
template: 're_engagement',
personalization: {
name: '{{user.name}}',
lastActivity: '{{user.last_activity_at}}'
}
}
}
],
recovery: {
retries: 3,
backoff: 'exponential'
}
});